
We worry a lot about Moore’s Law running out of gas right about now. Now comes former AMD CEO Hector Ruiz with this piece on Harvard Business Review’s blog: “There, however, is a possible “off-ramp” to Moore’s Law that offers [...]
LOS ANGELES–So often, we get ahead of ourselves a consuming public, especially when it comes to technology innovation. Take power generation and smart-grid management. We know that electronics that drive enormous efficiency gains on the grid. After all, our smart [...]
By Malcolm Fuller, contributing writer SANTA CLARA, Calif. – You wake up in your chilly San Francisco apartment (or any chilly place for that matter), and your first instinct is not to crank up the thermostat several notches (too expensive!). [...]
By Brian Fuller We’ve written all lot about the quickening pace of innovation in automotive electronics design. And you’ll recall the centerpiece of the first part of the Drive for Innovation was an all-electric Chevy Volt, which took us around [...]
12 August 2012
It's a (fill in the blank) new world today in innovation. In the old, old days, you had technology companies named after the innovators who founded them. Hewlett-Packard. Watkins-Johnson. Varian Brothers.
Then startups chose names associated with their technology: Intel, Advanced Micro Devices, Linear Technology, Analog Devices.
Today innovators choose goofy but memorable names (Facebook, Twitter, Zynga, Groupon) and often, according to Dan McGinn of Harvard Business Review, they aren't even sticking with a given technology.
In a podcast interview previewing an upcoming article, McGinn notes that often today's startups prototype a technology or service and then quickly pivot to something else.
"It's the changeability aspect that makes these companies seem different," he says in an interview with Sarah Green.
The companies are "not built to last but built to be bought by Google," he adds.
Believe it
I couldn't agree more. Innovation itself and the success of a company are tied up in one word: belief. Technologists have to believe in their product and themselves in order for a company to even have a chance at breaking out and becoming successful.
Anything less is dilettante-ism, serving only the needs of the "inventor" and not the customer.
Do you agree or am I missing a major tipping point in the evolution of business?
*Required
