Regenerative braking

24 October 2011

By John Donovan, Low-Power Design, for Drive for Innovation

Just as the Chevy Volt uses an electric motor to propel you forward, it uses the same motor to help slow you down. When you either lift your foot from the accelerator or press on the brake pedal, the main drive motor temporarily operates as a generator, working to partially recharge the battery bank. In this mode, the motor produces a drag on the front wheels, slowing the car, though not to a complete stop. As the car slows, the effect of the regenerative braking fades out and the friction brakes take you the rest of the way to a full stop.

More design resources

GM tuned the Volt’s control software so that the car drives like a snappy gas-powered car with an automatic transmission. If you want your Volt to drive more like a sports car with a manual transmission, do the following:

1. Take off and get up to a reasonable speed.
2. Shift the transmission selector to the Low setting. This engages electric motor braking when you’re coasting.
3. Press the dashboard Sport mode button. This will give you a bit more zip at higher RPMs.
4. Now take your foot off the gas pedal.

The Low setting makes the Volt’s regenerative braking considerably more aggressive, like driving a manual transmission car in second or third gear.  You’ll slow down quickly without needing to tap the brake pedal, though you’ll still need to do that to come to a complete stop. Doesn’t that feel more like you’re driving a sports car?

How Well Does It Work?

Just how efficient is the Volt’s regenerative braking system, and how well does it work? You know the answer to that: it depends.

GM used the Environmental Protection Agency's City Driving Cycle Federal Test Procedure (FTP) to rate the Volt’s All Electric Range (AER). The maximum regenerative deceleration achieved during these tests was 0.315g, at which point the efficiency of the regenerative braking system was just under 75%. As the car slows down, the efficiency drops rapidly below 0.1g, at which point you’re increasingly reliant on the friction brakes.  At higher speeds the effect of regenerative braking is outweighed by wind drag and tire friction.

The 75% figure represents the effectiveness of the regenerative braking system in slowing the forward motion of the car. Since the braking motor and electronics are ones that are driving the car—when braking the current flow is just reversed—the efficiency of the motor as a generator in refueling the battery bank is well over 90%.

So how much energy does regenerative braking put back into the system when you’re driving downhill with your foot off the accelerator? It depends on the kinetic energy of the car, plus the speed/wind drag, road grade, deceleration, and system controller’s algorithm. The basic answer is, “Not a lot—but it helps.” If you’ve just crested a small hill, you won’t get much back. If you’re driving down a long, steep mountain road, the regenerative payback can notably improve your mileage—not to mention prolong the life of your disk brakes.

If that isn’t a sufficient answer—and it isn’t—you can check the GM Volt Performance Simulation results based on the same inputs that GM used in their evaluations.

A nice feature for GM to add would be an adjustable regenerative braking system with a button on the dashboard where you could preset the desired stiffness of the system. That would enable you to choose a higher resistance when you’re going down a steep incline, just as you’d downshift to a lower gear in another car.

Still, the fact that you can recoup some of the energy that it took to get up to speed or up the mountain is one of those nice benefits that come with an electric vehicle.

Tom November 1, 2011 at 10:39 am

Vote -1 Vote +1

It sounds like regenerative braking doesn’t extend your drive much more than my throwing an un-drunk glass of water onto the lawn keeps me from having to water the lawn. However, in a similar way at least it’s not the waste that turning the kinetic energy into heat through the brakes would be, and it gives a more familiar feel to the driving. And this is the real world so you can’t consume energy to get up to speed without losses any more than you can reconvert back into potential energy without losses. But I’m still happier pouring my unused water on the garden than down the drain.

As I recall from my olde tyme internal combustion engine courses, taking your foot off the gas with the transmission engaged provides some cooling benefit to the engine, but without the fuel/air mixture being carefully measured and spark well timed, you’re throwing a lot of poorly-burned hydrocarbons out the exhaust. Even the ’69 VW had a mechanism to slow the throttling of the engine to minimize the junkie air caused by a quick removal of the foot from the gas.

It would be interesting to know what percentage of the battery gets recharged normally by regenerative braking. I’d guess less than 1%. I hope it didn’t cost much to accommodate it.

Glenn Crosby November 1, 2011 at 11:32 am

+1
Vote -1 Vote +1

I’ve experienced an advantage of regenerative braking that doesn’t get much attention. My regular brake pads last much, much longer on my Highlander. I used to go through brake pads every 30K miles, but my hybrid Highlander with regenerative braking has 112K miles on the original brakes and still going strong.

Bill November 1, 2011 at 11:56 am

Vote -1 Vote +1

For “stop and go” driving, regenerative braking into a “battery” of ultracaps seems far more efficient than charging batteries.

ClarksonCote November 24, 2011 at 9:01 pm

+2
Vote -1 Vote +1

I went up and down Mount Washington Auto Road with the Volt, had no battery left at the top.  At the bottom, my battery was back up to 60%, and the brake rotors were cool to the touch.  Conventional cars going down the mountain have to stop numerous times to let their brakes cool, whereas I did not stop at all.  I thought this was very impressive.

Bruce November 29, 2011 at 9:03 am

Vote -1 Vote +1

A hybrid car like the Volt or Prius should get better mileage on the city driving cycle than it does on the highway driving cycle.  The aerodynamic losses are lower at low speed, and most of the braking losses are eliminated during the city cycle due to the regenerative braking.  I think if the manufacturers would abandon permenant magnet motors and use would field rotors, they might recover more of the braking energy.  During regenerative braking, when the motor speed is low enough that the motor voltage is lower than the battery voltage, there may not be any recovery.  
Notice that the Chinese are making a car using compressed air rather than batteries.  If they use an adiabatic accumulator to store the air, they might get very good regenerative braking efficiency.  
Eaton has a project to use hydraulics for hybrid trucks for both garbage trucks and UPS trucks.  Hydraulics have many advantages over electrics for these applications.  Using an adiabadic accumulator, the efficiency of energy recovery during braking can approach 90%.  And the hydraulic technology already exists, and the hydraulic components essentially last forever, needing new seals only infrequently.  And the hydraulic components will not catch fire.

Leave a Reply

*Required

* * *
CAPTCHA Image

*

New Products From Avnet

  • HP 3PAR StoreServ 7000

    The world’s most advanced storage platform has extended its midrange offerings, delivering effortless, efficient, bulletproof, and future proof storage to the entire midrange. Store all of your data on a single system that supports advanced features, such as storage federation and automated tiering, and which enables you to start small and grow without disruption.

  • Advantech RISC Computing Platforms

    UBC-DS31 is powered by a Freescale ARM Cortex-A9 i.MX6 dual core processor, with 1GB DDR3 memory & 4GB flash onboard. It has 2D and 3D graphics built in, and supports dual displays with up to 1080p high resolution output on low power consumption.

The Way Back Machine

The Way Back Machine

Connect With Us

Find us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter